Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softengi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Softengi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear promotion, I've already removed not referenced parts with links to PR.com and other not reliable press-releases; the remaining few sources are not reliable and routine. Delete per not WP:NCORP Tls9-me (talk) 08:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing can improve the page,for lack of verifiability Sl67890 (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Technology, and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Coverage found in Gnews, for the company, consists of numerous hits, all Forbes Council articles, which are not RS. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.