Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soho Radio
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Soho Radio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Online-only radio station. Only one non-primary reference given - the rest are self-links to the station's own website. Most of the article is a list of people who have appeared on the station as guests at some point. Flip Format (talk) 19:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Organizations, and United Kingdom. Flip Format (talk) 19:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Apart from one newspaper mention in the context of prohibition in 1926 here (joke), there are several other sources available. I'm unsure about this one and that one, but these seem fine: DJ Mag, Evening Standard, another Evening Standard, Guardian & Guardian again. Sources currently in the article are bad, I agree, but with these new ones I believe we have WP:SIGCOV. As a sidenote, there's also WP:BEFORE ;) --LordPeterII (talk) 20:41, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:NORG thanks to the sources found by LordPeterII. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: A GNG pass per the citations linked by LordPeterII. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 16:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:NORG with sources added to the article by Rillington. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 00:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.