Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something to Hold Onto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Saving Jane. (non-admin closure) BEAMALEXANDER!, talk 04:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Something to Hold Onto

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This album doesn't seem to have any claim to notability in my opinion, and doesn't come near passing the notability guidelines. There are brief mentions in some later interviews with the band, when they found some success, but nothing that warrants this album having its own article. JohnmgKing (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. JohnmgKing (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. JohnmgKing (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. JohnmgKing (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete. There is so little info in this article that it seems pretty useless and there are no sources cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janitor Joseph (talk • contribs) 15:59, 10 June 2020 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:03, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Saving Jane: Barely found anything about the album. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 02:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above, no sign of independent notability, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:04, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redrect: Does not qualify for a stand alone article. -- Otr500 (talk) 11:10, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: @Fram: Re the above... I think it does not stand for a mention at all. This article was prodded thirteen years ago and it hasn't improved with age. The self-referencing and uncited "talks about this album, which appears to be an independent release, on their current MySpace bio": like Facebook, no guarantee that the impoverished MySpace page is actually the band, and it's an unreliable source anyway. I can't find this 'bio'... does it exist at all, anywhere ? In fact all other articles for this entity, and the Saving Jane blatant promo-padded-out article itself, must be under question, with its sources list full of magician-style misdirection. The whole caboodle of Saving Jane articles look like duck test spam to me. Certainly at least this one should go. Acabashi (talk) 09:40, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.