Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sommer Nectarhoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sommer Nectarhoff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NAUTHOR. The subject has written a lot of books but I am not seeing any RS reviews or commentary outside of bookstore sites, reddit etc. Jbh ^Talk 15:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 15:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 15:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article author, Writerlier, has asked on the article talk page that the article be userfied. Jbh ^Talk 20:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It appears that the books are self-published Kindle books, so the author will be unlikely to be notable regardless of additional work on the article. The one "review" is actually an except added by the author himself to the site. LaMona (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now and draft and userfy as mentioned as there's simply nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails notability criteria. Userfy doesn't hurt. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.