Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soybean Processors Association of India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per Dom, as the sources don't seem to satisfy CORPDEPTH. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Soybean Processors Association of India

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG part of a series of articles created by a WP:SPA with a probable undeclared WP:COI Dom from Paris (talk) 09:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 09:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 09:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A google search on news found significant number of references to the company/association which will satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH. I agree with the observation of Dom from Paris regarding SPA. The article has to be rewritten from a NPOV standpoint. --Hagennos (talk) 16:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment and I agree that the association comes up a good number of times in articles but from what I could see there was very little in depth coverage and most were "according to SOPA..." SOPA figures state that..." and this kind of thing. Most of the articles that I found are in my opinion information that has been fed to the sources by this organisation about soya. It is the significance of coverage that I am concerned about and not the number of GHITS. i had a look at a dozen or so sources and I couldn't find any coverage of the association itself. Could you maybe add some here? Dom from Paris (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--Per Dom's reasoning.I'm willing to change my stand, shall anything more significant is churned out.~ Winged Blades^Godric 06:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.