Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Bee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Space Bee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable band, self promotion Donaldd23 (talk) 00:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Doesn't meet the criteria for WP:BAND or WP:GNG. I agree this page seems more like fan-driven promotion and desiring to appear significant. Kind of impressive this page has been around for 14 years. Searching does not yield anything that would satisfy notability requirements. --Tautomers_{(T C)} 07:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 10:20, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non notable fails WP:BAND. -Xclusivzik (talk) 06:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.