Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spec-Property

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete - spam article. Nick-D (talk) 09:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spec-Property

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost certainly an undisclosed paid edit. Editor has only two edits on Wikipedia, both for this article, which has been produced fully formed on the first go. No paid editing disclosure to be found anywhere (not that this would save it, because a paid editing disclosure certainly cannot do that). KDS4444 ^(talk) 00:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Editor is certainly a new account, but does have multiple edits across a handful of articles. Could have been an IP editor for a while? Does not look fully formed to me. Aoziwe (talk) 11:47, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 04:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. Repost. Previously at Spec Property, paid promotion from a shill. duffbeerforme (talk) 21:58, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.