Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spellbound Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:01, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spellbound Pictures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Cabayi (talk) 17:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 17:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Companies, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.