Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spitshine Records (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spitshine Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable label, not covered by reliable sources. Hoponpop69 (talk) 00:07, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- The reference in the article, Homocore, is enough to show that this fairly marginalized topic meets the GNG. The discussion there is extensive. See this search in the book. Also this label is discussed in this dissertation from the University of Vienna and this book on Queer Feminist punk. Clearly satisfies the GNG, therefore. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 18:30, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.