Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springfontein Wine Estate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Springfontein Wine Estate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does nothing but promote the subject subjectively. Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG, not WP:NCORP either. Sources don't cover the subject significantly. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wine and South Africa. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: All sources found are passing mentions or not independent of subject, but I only checked English sources, maybe German or Afrikaans sources might have more. At least based on English references this fails WP:NCORP. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.