Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Stan's Brewery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 23:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

St. Stan's Brewery

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local brewery. No reliable sources. Google and Google Books searches turned up nothing more than directory entries. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is significant coverage, both in reviews of its beers and for its involvement in major case against mega-brewer Anheuser-Busch. Numerous articles in news database (not free) include:

I added a bit to the article. Improve, don't delete. --do ncr am 05:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (indicate) @ 17:09, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I was unconvinced by the references added to the article (and re-cited above) because none of them carry links to the source - making it impossible to tell if there was significant coverage or a mere mention. However I was able to find a linkable LA Times story [1] which I added to the article. This brewery may be better known for its activism than for its beer, but that activism appears to have gotten it national recognition. --MelanieN (talk) 20:23, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:22, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.