Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StackBlitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:20, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

StackBlitz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nonnotabkke software tool. Refs are routine PR coveraage --Altenmann >talk 09:02, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software, Websites, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Delete: Article with promotional tone and promotional sources. Also, I would recommend fixing your spelling to make your nomination more convincing. CabinetCavers (talk) 13:06, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.