Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanford who's who

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted as I tagged it (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 01:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stanford who's who

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a not-very-notable subject. It does not have any reliable sources other than itself, and a quick web search does not yield many sources at all. epicgenius @ 23:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC) (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. epicgenius @ 23:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC) (talk) 23:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are a few trivial mentions in press releases, such as [1] and [2], and there are a few hits on Google Books that seem to be authors who are bragging about their inclusion. However, I don't see coverage in reliable sources about the Who's Who itself. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.