Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staron
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:53, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Staron
- Staron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources, page is about a single product that has received little attention from the media. Really not much claim of significance either. DiscantX 02:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Just a non-notable brand for a notable class of product (solid surface countertops). We're not a catalogue. Andy Dingley (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 03:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 03:29, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete and restore original redirect? - Nothing to suggest at this time. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- The redirect (to Corian) was just plain wrong. Why would we redirect one brandname to a competitor? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.