Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Static Revenger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Static Revenger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost unsourced promotional article with a strong suspicion of COI and a smell of sockpuppetry/meatpupptry. The Banner talk 00:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. An article should not be deleted because it has a "promotional tone" and that it might've been made by a sockpuppet. If there is promotional tone of the article, fix it. 和DITOR E tails 18:57, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, I tried. But the two were constantly reverting me. The Banner talk 21:37, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:19, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Hi, how do i fix this exactly? I edited yesterday (September 27, 2013) after reading and following many of Wikipedia rules i.e. added citations, external links, etc. Can someone please review and let me know if this is ok now? If it needs more, ill add more. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oldaqp (talk • contribs) 22:09, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to fail WP:BASIC. There may be numerous sources about his work, but apparently not about the subject himself. -- Trevj (talk) 10:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Added references/citations 'about the subject himself' Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.50.103 (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.