Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StealthChat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete , nac SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

StealthChat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Plenty of references, but only brief mentions or unreliable sources. Also fails WP:CORPDEPTH. CNMall41 (talk) 20:57, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No significant coverage found; does not appear to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. gongshow talk 23:54, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 16:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 16:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks like copy/paste from the company website. Correction, it is copy/paste from the company website (this alone is a good reason for deletion). Pavlor (talk) 08:24, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article was posted in February via AfC and its author was reminded about copyright violation problem. Pavlor (talk) 08:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.