Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephan Nance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stephan Nance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. This puff piece is stuffed full of references but most are not good. His own site, shop, last.fm, youtube, blogs, a scholarship scheme, passing mentions. The closest to being reasonable is a look what this local student is doing piece in an online student news site Daily Emerald. Nothing significant. The Akademia Music Awards are not a major award, they are a pay for play award farm. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 08:09, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 08:09, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 08:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this looks promotional, the sources are not RS and content is synthetically produced. Semitransgenic _talk. 15:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent reliable sources giving substantial coverage. The closest to a reliable source was the Guardian piece, except that was a reader review. --Rob (talk) 15:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.