Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Durham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Durham

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG as a non-notable write-in candidate who received minimal coverage from local sources eight years ago. An obscure third-party run does not confer notability. KidAd (talk) 22:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being a fringe party candidate for president is not an automatic inclusion freebie that exempts a person from having to clear WP:GNG on the sourcing, but the sources here aren't getting him over GNG — five of the seven footnotes are WP:PRIMARYSOURCES that are not support for notability at all, such as the self-published content of his own political party and a government document. And while the other two are from real media, one's a low-power community radio station and the other is an alt-weekly newspaper, which does not add up to enough coverage to get him over GNG if it's all you can find. Bearcat (talk) 17:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, doesn’t meet GNG. Gleeanon409 (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Fringe presidential candidate. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 21:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails Wp:gng. Jcoolbro (talk) (c) 13:08, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable candidate.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.