Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Sandor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Sandor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR, with no roles of any particular note. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Pennsylvania. Shellwood (talk) 13:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes NACTOR through roles in Bonnie's Kids, The No Mercy Man, Stryker (1983 film), Hell's Angels '69, Fire and Ice (1983 film) and The Only Way Home (Coverage here, here and here). Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 15:16, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also passes GNG through coverage here, here, here, here and here. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:46, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Other than Fire and Ice (for which he provided his voice), the films are obscure and seen by few. One one of the examples of "coverage" is viewable, and that one doesn't even mention him. The rest are paywalled, and I strongly suspect are merely passing mentions. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:49, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Every single one of the sources listed for GNG discusses Sandor's career so I don't know which one you're talking about. If you're talking about the book, that one was listed to prove that The Only Way Home is notable and that Sandor's role in it is significant, and the sources actually does talk about Sandor. That the films are "obscure and seen by few" is complerely and utterly irrelevant for NACTOR. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 01:15, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NACTOR states they must be "notable films". Also, all your newspaper articles are paywalled. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:40, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and all of these films pass GNG. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 23:48, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely. Strong Keep. An easy NACTOR pass. -Mushy Yank. 21:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Low-budget pieces of schlock are not notable films, and a journeyman doesn't satisfy NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter that they're "low-budget pieces of schlock", they pass GNG and are thus notable. Your own personal opinions regarding them or the actor are completely irrelevant. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 13:33, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

keep, passes WP:NACTOR and any of the further squabble above should be discarded and we all move on to bigger and better things. Iljhgtn (talk) 01:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you big, bad keep !voters. Where are your sources, you know, the ones you need to satisfy WP:GNG? The two references currently there don't qualify. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Somebodyidkfkdt has provided sources above to show that he meets WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.