Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sthenias javanicus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. per WP:SKCRIT#1. No policy-based reason for deletion was advanced. – Joe (talk) 07:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sthenias javanicus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has very little information, may not meet notability requirements Aydoh8 (talk) 23:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Aydoh8 (talk) 23:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete One hit in Gbooks [1], looks trivial. I can't find anything in jstor or Gscholar. I wonder if it's known under a different name. Oaktree b (talk) 00:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  More hits on Sthenias (Sthenias) javanicus, but I still can't find much. Oaktree b (talk) 00:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per longstanding consensus (WP:NSPECIES), individual species are invariably notable. Jfire (talk) 03:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Accepted species, no confusion about holotype or synonyms; original description already linked, present in the relevant databases [2][3]. Please have a look at the responses to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clivina jodasi and desist from any more of these nominations. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "Article has very little information" is not a reason to delete one. The species is accepted with no confusion about holotype or synonyms, as mentioned above by Elmidae. Mooonswimmer 14:06, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.