Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonner kebab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  18:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stonner kebab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A dish created in one chip shop in Glasgow. Fails WP:GNG. Specifically, questionable whether there is significant coverage. Brief mentions in sources for this one-off creation, but I did not find sources reporting this food as appearing elsewhere or even elsewhen. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 22:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 15:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I found quite a bit of coverage of it in blogs and forums, but more significantly, it is mentioned in several books including this, this and others, spanning 2006 to 2013. So it exists and is talked about and therefore meets WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: the first of those links returns a 404 error for me; the second is a passing mention on a single page of a 300-page book. Existence is not sufficient to meet WP:GNG – that requires "significant coverage", which I'm not convinced is contained in You Are Awful... Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 22:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - coverage is not in-depth - i.e., not WP:SIGCOV. Neutrality^talk 04:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.