Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StormMQ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

StormMQ

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software Project/Company that appears to have shutdown around 2016, Website offline since 2018. Github site not updated since 2017. No sign of widespread use. - SimonLyall (talk) 00:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and England. AllyD (talk) 07:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

StormMQ still exists but not in its original form. The only historic reason to retain a mention is that it was a major contributor to the AMQP 1.0 and MQTT ISO standards.

No longer active as a company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.155.55.171 (talk) 08:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Doesn't pass WP:NSOFT or WP:NCORP (looks like the page is about the software, but neither seems satisfied). I can't actually find any independent coverage; besides Crunchbase, LinkedIn, and Github, it's all self-published press releases, slide decks, and whitepapers ([1], [2], [3]). Participating in the AMQP working group ([4]) definitely isn't enough to establish notability for either the company or the software. Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 02:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete'. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources found. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 19:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I see some passing mentions but no in-depth, high-quality sources to satisfy GNG. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.