Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategies of media hegemony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strategies of media hegemony

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similarly to Media hegemony by the same editor, this essay-like article suggests it is a college piece rather than intended to be an encyclopedia article. The title,style and content, together with the duplication of Media hegemony, suggest we should either WP:BLOWITUP or move it back to draft space to completely rework and retitle it. Sionk (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (see my nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media hegemony): the two articles are close to being duplicates. Pichpich (talk) 19:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Original research. Contents could be temporarily preserved, if the author wishes to rework Media hegemony in the draft space. Ceosad (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:13, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Essay.TheLongTone (talk) 14:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Original research. → Call me Razr Nation 07:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this as a duplicate. Bearian (talk) 00:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.