Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strength Matters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per consensus --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strength Matters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't qualify for WP:NMAG. Sources are either self-published, dead links or from non-notable websites. Consensus needed for inclusion. Allahomora^(talk) 16:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Page references unreliable sources and dead links. The RS that are included detail James Breese but not the page's subject, Strength Matters. Reese may be notable enough for a BLP but not his magazine. Meatsgains (talk) 18:43, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the article is still questionable despite its current seemingly acceptable appearance and my searches also found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Absence of reliable sources means that notability has not been established for either this company or its output. Fails to pass WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:NMAG. Drchriswilliams (talk) 09:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails Wikipedia:Notability (periodicals). James Breese might be notable, but not his magazine. Edwardx (talk) 13:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per all of the above.VictoriaGrayson^Talk 17:53, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.