Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strippergate (Israel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 00:15, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strippergate (Israel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

This is pure Wikipedia:Content forking. The only notable person is the father, and so the text may be included there. No reason for a new lemma in Wikipedia. --Hannover86 (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or Rename to Yair Netanyahu. I don't think the event meets LASTING, though it did have SIGCOV, it is really NOTNEWS (at present - the sort of event that is in the airwaves for a cycle or three). Yair himself, however, does meet GNG by himself. He actually does have an entry on hewiki - [1], and did pass a deletion discussion in August 2017 (following different political statements and a bruhahah over some cartoons) - hewiki AFD - and he should pass enwiki's GNG threshold (since he has been covered as a subject for years) which is actually lower than hewiki's notability guidelines in this case.Icewhiz (talk) 11:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I we can rename it to Yair Netanyahu and write about the anti-Semitic Meme he had posted. The meme that was liked by the head of KKK.--APS^talk 13:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is ample space to cover the incident in Yair Netanyahu (who should meet GNG). You also have WP:COMMONNAME problems here - the news cycley incident isn't known as strippergate (Ha'aretz in English used this in a piece, not used in Hebrew, not used widely in English) - it also involved a bit more than strippers (i.e. Yair discussing possible sexual "sharing" of his girlfriend, and talk about how a gas tycoon was enriched by Bibi). My 2 cents is that the event itself is really a NOTNEWS thing as a standalone - but fit for inclusion (carefully with enwiki's BLP policy) in Yair Netanyahu.Icewhiz (talk) 13:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: clearly relevant because of the corruption debate in Israel. At least as notable as gamer gate and pizzagate.--APS^talk 13:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore this guy is known for trying to shut down articles like this. With the wildest claims. According to him I as a Jew am anti-Semitic because I, like most of Israel, dare to write about this topic.--APS^talk 13:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to article on Benjamin Netanyahu. Wikipedia is not a newspaper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 08:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 08:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Clearly fails WP:NOTNEWS its clearly "news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities" --Shrike (talk) 13:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep clearly a lasting relevance in Israel. At least more relevant than gamergate and pizzagate. Not to mention that the German Wikipedia, known for its fast deleting policy, actually kept their article.--93.207.55.36 (talk) 14:12, 18 January 2018 (UTC)— 93.207.55.36 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. --Shrike (talk) 14:59, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as Wikipedia:Content forking. I have no idea whether Yanir Netanyahu is sufficiently notable to support an article - most offspring of heads of state are not. The incident coverd in this article fails WP:GNG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per WP:NOTNEWS. All the citations are news reports from a single day, a little over two weeks ago. Has anyone cared since? It's too early to tell. Mangoe (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Too many wikipedians seem to be slavishly devoted to transferring everything in the news into a bloody article. It's bad enough with Trump issues. If a politician farts, or their kid cusses, it doesn't belong in a bloody encyclopedia. --Animalparty! (talk) 06:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - As others have rightly pointed out, Wikipedia is not a newspaper. I hesitate to use that as a reason myself, because I'm trying to think of a newspaper that runs two sentence articles. No, we can't simply rename this to the BLP involved (unless you'd like to see how quickly we can delete a BLP1E). Merge? Meh. If this is significant to any other article, it's already there. Comparisons to Gamergate controversy and Pizzagate conspiracy theory are absurd. Both are clearly -- indisputably -- notable. (If you think either is not notable, please take it to AfD and ping me, just so I can watch.) If, several years down the road this has proven to generate meaningful coverage, we can easily recreate to two sentences that make up this orphaned mini-stub. - SummerPhD^v2.0 19:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.