Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strong Image Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 23:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Image Films

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single secondary source cited is a bio of the founder, not really about the company. Google turns up an occasional blog mention of the company, but no real independent coverage. Agtx (talk) 16:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The company is working on more films and TV shows that are not listed in this article. Google turns up more than an occasional blog mention of the company. --DesertRoad101 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 05:52, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this user has no edits in Article space. Agtx (talk) 01:08, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not convinced that a Talent Monthly editorial, even if it provided significant coverage of the company (which it doesn't), would be a reliable source for establishing notability. The remaining cited sources contain no more than trivial mentions. Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, and ProQuest turned up no significant coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources, so fails WP:CORP. Worldbruce (talk) 13:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as my searches found nothing even close to suggest local notability let alone universal notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:19, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.