Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stronger Community Party
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 14:44, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Stronger Community Party
- Stronger Community Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable political party, fails WP:ORG. ukexpat (talk) 16:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as A7. In my opinion, the article makes no claim of notability whatsoever. I initially nominated this for speedy deletion under A7, but someone disagreed with me. Gparyani (talk) 18:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The user has shown notability by the evidence described in the newspaper article. A new political party also is notable due to changes in the UK main political parties, where some of the major ones have lost much support. Sherald01Sherald01 (talk) 19:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The above comment was added by the creator of the article. Gparyani (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Just being a party isn't enough to be notable enough, and 1 source doesn't show significant, independent coverage, as required by WP:GNG. A party founded a few weeks ago isn't going to satisfy this, I can't find anything about them. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete It's too soon, and Wikipedia is not the news. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 20:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:43, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.