Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stu Megan (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 11:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Stu Megan
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Stu Megan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. Some passing mentions in the ext links but not sufficient for a WP:BLP. No indication of significance. Been on the cat:nn list for 10+ years. No updates. scope_creepTalk 08:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 11:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing, England, Canada, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Agree with nom, fails WP:SIGCOV. Baqi:) (talk) 13:27, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Even if every sentence was cited (which it isn't) it is a rather unremarkable career that fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 03:18, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: The article fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:BIO. There's little to no in-depth coverage of the subject in sources. Most of the articles content is unsourced and reads like a resume, while the mentioned sources provide only passing mentions, which is just not enough to establish notability. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 06:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.