Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Style MiSia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Style MiSia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article fails the general notability guideline and WP:MUSICBIO. He lacks significant independent coverage in reliable sources. STATic message me! 23:05, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Bali88 (talk) 04:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can find no significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nomination. --Jersey92 (talk) 04:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NMUSIC and has 0 reliable sources, sources are to album release pages and other dubious sources. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 04:59, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.