Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suad Abdi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suad Abdi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the criteria of WP:NPOL Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 00:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: what about the Guardian reference? --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 00:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment NPOL requires "significant" press coverage. Just one reference isn't enough for "significant." The Guardian is a reliable source, but not everybody who gets a story in the Guardian gets an article solely because they were mentioned in the Guardian.Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 02:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don’t see sufficient sources to demonstrate notability. There are unfortunately a lot of women named Suad Abdi and there may be some additional coverage out there but I can’t see anything else that appears to relate to this subject or would amount to in depth coverage in any case. Mccapra (talk) 08:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.