Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhasish Chakraborty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subhasish Chakraborty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like a resume. Legacypac (talk) 23:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. War wizard90 (talk) 00:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. War wizard90 (talk) 00:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. War wizard90 (talk) 00:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The only way of cleaning this is by throwing in some WP:TNT, Per nom reads like a CV and no evidence of notability. –Davey2010^Talk 04:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with Fire: Eeesh, I'm all for the dynamite. The sources listed are almost all press releases, passing mentions or quotes from the subject (which according to the GNG explicitly cannot support the notability of the subject). Now maybe there'd be sources that could satisfy the GNG out there, but this is such a self-promotional trainwreck ... leaving aside that it looks like this is the dude's own article. (= User:Subhasishc54) Nha Trang ^Allons! 14:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -Subject may meet WP:BASIC, but the article in its present shape is totally unencyclopedic, such that WP:Blow it up and start over may be only remedy. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 15:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.