Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suburban Home Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 22:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suburban Home Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NCORP failure. Graywalls (talk) 21:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC) To be more specific, notability guidelines for companies and organizations places stronger emphasis on quality of sources. In one source, they're described as local in a local newspaper. Other results that show up aren't the type of sources that indicates strong general notability beyond the local interest. Graywalls (talk) 07:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 21:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 21:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Meets WP:MUSIC's sense of "one of the more important indie labels", and also probably meets WP:CORP over and above this, to boot. Chubbles (talk) 14:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment it's my impression that WP:NCORP is the right evaluation criteria for a notability of a recording label and under that, I find that this fails notability. I'm not convinced music notability is the proper guideline for a recording label. Graywalls (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Google search what you nominate before you nominate it please. There are multiple hits dedicated to the topic just from a casual search. More than the minimum to meet notability standards. Bluedude588 (talk) 05:14, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

reply well per WP:HITS, the hit count isn't an appropriate measure of notability. A bunch of top results are sites like Facebook, bandcamp.com that don't contribute towards notability. I only came across one reliable source, which is a Denver Post article. Graywalls (talk) 07:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well here's a some more. Westworld. AV Club. Nailed Magazine. And the Denver Post. Bluedude588 (talk) 19:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Passes GNG. Fun fact: I own a few records from this label. Missvain (talk) 06:26, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep based on the sources discovered by User:Bluedude588. If not for those, I would probably have done with Delete. BIG BURLEY 23:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Nominator seems to have missed looking at a few sources, based on User:Bluedude588 comments, it should be on Wiki. Shashanksinghvi334 (talk) 06:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep The list of notable current artists shows that this record label definitely meets WP:NMUSIC and should not be deleted. Ambrosiawater (talk) 20:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep a WP:BEFORE search reveals a notable record label. Wm335td (talk) 18:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.