Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhaker Upadhyay
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Sudhaker Upadhyay
- Sudhaker Upadhyay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable academic, fails prof test, self-penned vanity page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. On what looks like a successful academic trajectory, but citation counts are too low (in a high-citation field) to demonstrate a pass of WP:PROF#C1, and nothing else looks like a cause for notability. WP:TOOSOON. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Off to a good start but, as yet, WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC).
- Delete The subject has published several papers in high-impact high-energy physics journals such as Phys. Rev. D and Phys. Lett. B, but at the moment, there are few citations to these articles to pass WP:PROF#C1. The editorship of a non-notable journal such as the Journal of Experimental Physics (which to be honest, feels like a predatory journal to me), is also not good enough to pass WP:PROF#C8 — Stringy Acid (talk) 09:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - No evidence of notability per WP:PROF. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.