Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhasagar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhasagar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page does not list any reliable sources. All that's listed are media and news articles in vernacular languages. The language of the page is also not appropriate for Wikipedia. Additionally, it does not conform to BLP policies and the subject of the article seems to have low notability. Seems unfit to me for Wikipedia ParvatPrakash (talk) 11:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, and Madhya Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:39, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This article features unsuitable language for an encyclopaedia. Also, no references to establish notability. All I could find was news articles in Hindi only, without any solid biographical matter.Goyama (talk) 02:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No secondary sources as per WP:RS mention the subject. I tried finding some, but didn't find any that could be considered secondary. Even if language is not in line with WP:BLPSTYLE, it can be taken care of. A few sentences also violate WP:GRAPEVINE and most of the content in lede violates WP:OR and seems to have been written by a devotee/follower of the subject or at least someone with a conflict of interest. Expectopatronum30 (talk) 06:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not hard to find secondary sources unless notability is actually low. I would volunteer to improve the language of the article, but it's the sources that are the problem. ParvatPrakash (talk) 07:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from nom-- tagging User:RJShashwat here as they might also be able to help decide better with their activity in this project. ParvatPrakash (talk) 07:22, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @ParvatPrakash. I am curious to know why was this article not nominated for deletion using WP:PROD. It contains pedestrian language that does not reflect WP:MOS. It should have been deleted much earlier. RJShashwat (talk) 06:51, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, I just noticed that it was nominated for WP:PROD earlier, but was not deleted. Anyways, I think it is better to not have this article in the main-space unless the subject gains more notability. Since there is not much referenced content, moving it to the draft-space is not worth much. RJShashwat (talk) 06:58, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Article does not meet WP:BLPSTYLE and WP:MOS. The subject has poor notability with only news headlines and no other WP:RS mentioning them. They definitely do not deserve an independent article. RJShashwat (talk) 06:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article for starters doesn't meet the notability criteria. Additionaly, since I can understand and speak Hindi fluently - the references from Dainik Bhaskar only describes the content of his sermons, while the only remaining source from Rajasthan Patrika isn't accessible The AP (talk) 17:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.