Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhir Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhir Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG not enough coverage Purosinaloense T/K 06:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Purosinaloense T/K 06:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. -Hatchens (talk) 07:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Nowhere near meeting our notability criteria. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 09:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom, nothing fails GNG. DmitriRomanovJr (talk) 10:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - accomplished does not equate with notable. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.