Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudwerk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sudwerk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is largely an advertisement for the company's beers. No sense of notability. Prof. Mc (talk) 19:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 19:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 19:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The sources need cleanup but I think the Reuters [1] and Sacbee [2] sources are good enough for WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • On a closer look, the Reuters source is a press release and doesn't count towards notability. Striking my comment while I search for better sourcing. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Weak keep. Local newspaper coverage [3] [4] and in-depth coverage in a published book [5] puts it over threshold to me, but only barely. The book also provides an actual claim of significance: "largest brewpub in the US" in 1993. I've rewritten the article based more purely on these reliable sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as creator; meets WP:GNG. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The brewery seems to be mentioned in beer guides, such as California Breweries North, and The Beer Book, but I am not sure that these count as in-depth. Note that there also a Sudwerk brewery out of Zurich[6]. --Mark viking (talk) 22:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep a marginal keep per WP:HEY and David's nice rewrite to include RS and to create a more neutral POV. --Mark viking (talk) 00:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The brewery has an adequate number of write-ups in secondary sources to pass the general notability guideline. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 00:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.