Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suheyl Umar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suheyl Umar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing significant about his career in sources. Fails WP:NSCHOLAR. Störm (talk) 11:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 13:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 13:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 13:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Added 5 new references to the article on 7 January 2018 including 3 references to Dawn (newspaper) and 1 reference to Pakistan Today newspaper. He was the director of Iqbal Academy Pakistan from 1997 to 2014 and has written over a dozen scholarly books in English. Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:57, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough. They are either namechecks or trivial announcements which they do as a director of X institute. No source discuss themselves personally. Störm (talk) 09:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Many books, but WorldCat shows all single-digit or low double-digit (e.g. 20s) holdings. This is below the conventions for PROF. Agricola44 (talk) 19:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.