Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunwest Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sunwest Solutions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG for lack of available reliable sources. - Mr X 13:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This AfD and my CSD A7 were placed near-simultaneously. Anyway, this article has a similar pattern to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nettech Ltd in that the article asserts claims sourced only to a Yellow Pages listing and uses the Design Museum website as a "reference" (which mentions neither firm). No real evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 13:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; clearly fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 13:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -was speedily deleted yesterday and then recreated as one of a suite of near identical articles supported by a multitude of trivial or irrelevant refs. No notability here. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 17:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should not be deleted The page is for new start up which is making lot of buzz. So i find it absurd saying to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisangel123 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Chrisangel123 has been blocked as another sockpuppet User:Maqs1231. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:51, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Should not be deleted~~ The admins should make a concrete effort to accomodate start ups.As wikipedia has little to no information regarding them. With information technology being so important, they simply cannot be ignored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisangel123 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot vote twice, and in both reasons you have given unsatisfactory reasons to support Keep. Wikipedia has specific notability policies for a reason.Ajf773 (talk) 17:31, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NCORP and article exists solely for advertising purposes. Ajf773 (talk) 17:31, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.