Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suresh Chakravarthi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:37, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suresh Chakravarthi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Had rejected the draft here Draft:Suresh Chakravarthi and now this has surfaced. No multiple significant roles to pass WP:NACTOR and the sources are not sufficient for WP:GNG either. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep clearly passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.38.14.10 (talk) 07:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Above is a random comment by an anonymous IP without explaining how it clearly passes the guidelines. Ought to be ignored. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 10:22, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bold third relist, soft-delete isn't available as an option here, but agree IP's 'keep' !vote lacks substance. Need further input from other editors to form a consensus here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Can't see any evidence of meeting NACTOR. There is some coverage with respect to Bigg Boss but that's not enough because participants are expected to be notable outside of thier involvement in Bigg Boss per WP:BIGBROTHER. -- Ab207 (talk) 20:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet WP:NACTOR. Peter303x (talk) 22:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.