Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surnames ending with wal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Surnames ending with wal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Perhaps I'm missing something here, but this seems like a completely trivial characteristic. I suppose "wal" has some meaning, but even so a list of "surnames ending in son" would be a trivial list as well, even though these are common in English (and Scandinavia and so on) and the ending has a meaning. Fram (talk) 07:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 07:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Google translation doesn't give a Hindi meaning for "wal". Clarityfiend (talk) 08:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No real context in this list therefore does not satisfy WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 08:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 08:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not Satisfy with Indian family surnames ending with wal. --SalmanZ (talk) 13:49, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No context to this list. - The9Man ^(Talk) 14:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete see below. Cedix (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)Comment I wonder if it would make sense to make a category for this. This looks like a useful category. Cedix (talk) 17:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• No. See WP:CATDEFINING. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link Clarityfiend. In that case I agree with the others that delete is the best course of action as there are no context or source. Cedix (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.