Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surojit Sen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Surojit Sen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG for lack of available reliable sources. Quasar G ^{t - c} 16:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@inbook{banerjee_sen_2014, title={Fakirs of Bengal}, DOI={10.1017/9789384463090.015}, booktitle={Devotion and Dissent in Indian History}, publisher={Foundation Books}, author={Banerjee, Sumanta and Sen, Surojit}, editor={Ramaswamy, VijayaEditor}, year={2014}, pages={255–273}}

Subhamay (talk) 08:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Aside from the subject's co-authorship of a chapter in "Devotion and Dissent in Indian History", and some indication of association with Qaushiq Mukherjee ([1]), neither of which suffices to establish notability in his own right, my searches are finding nothing to indicate encyclopaedic notability, whether under WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 18:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Doesn't pass WP:NAUTHOR, and nowhere near enough in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.