Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survived and Punished

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 02:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Survived and Punished (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass the notability criteria of a non-commercial organisation. On Google News, when I search "survived and punished" "prison" I get 14 results. These sources are good, but only pass mentions of the organisation rather than being articles specifically about the organisation. This article also isn't sourced well. I count 7/10 sources that are about women in prison rather than the organisation. —Panamitsu (talk) 02:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Crime, and Discrimination. —Panamitsu (talk) 02:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, California, Illinois, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.