Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Langley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Gracen (they/them) 22:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Langley

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'll admit this might be a hasty nomination, but this article is very poor quality and when I went to search for sources on Google News (the current sourcing is questionable, to put it lightly), I only found 2. These already insufficient sources fail WP:BLP1E, as far as I understand. I'm not familiar with BLP policy and frankly don't intend to be, but I didn't want to just template this article and move on. Gracen (they/them) 21:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Politicians. Gracen (they/them) 21:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: While the article would benefit from updating and copyediting, there are multiple articles on Langley establishing her notablity, for example:

female Lady Mayor, City of London; multiple articles

— ERcheck (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My goodness. I'll take this as a lesson to be much, much more thorough before nominating something at AfD. If you're willing I'd appreciate a link to a better venue get attention on articles like this; I'm about to withdraw this so leaving it on my talk page would be appreciated. Gracen (they/them) 22:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.