Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swapnil Deshmukh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Swapnil Deshmukh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Heavily promotional biography of a living person, making strong claims about the subject's expertise that are unsupported by any independent sources. The article creator has edit-warred to remove any cleanup tags from the article. An earlier version was deleted as a copyvio (speedy G12), but the article creator immediately re-created it, without the copied parts. Given this behavior, I suggest also salting the page. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 20:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 20:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 20:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless sources are produced demonstrating notability. (I've cut a ton of unreferenced material, per WP:BLP. There were also serious issues with promotion which I seem to have been trimming even as David Eppstein was launching this. :))--Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Moonriddengirl. Nthep (talk) 20:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, clear fluff. Daniel Case (talk) 21:02, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt per the nomination. Probably self-promotion, almost certainly COI. XOR'easter (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unsourced advertising, per nomination. --XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 22:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The claims of notability aren't backed up by independent sources, and some look suspect. For example an "Isomorphic Computer Program" is one which can run on either the client or the server, something that's been done for years and since he's only 25 it seems unlikely he invented the concept. He may have been the first to use it in a particular way, but that needs a reference. Neiltonks (talk) 10:50, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Zero notability whatsoever. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I couldn't find any evidence of notability per WP:GNG, WP:NACADEMIC, or otherwise. — MarkH21 (talk) 06:37, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete,No independent sources. Alex-h (talk) 12:43, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.