Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Creature

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 23:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Creature

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned article, relying entirely on primary and unreliable sources with no evidence of real media weighing in at all, of a newly formed band whose only discernible claim of notability is that it has one member who's also associated with another band whose notability is also hitched to primary and unreliable sources rather than media coverage — NMUSIC, however, requires a band to have two members who already had preexisting standalone notability before that can be the crux of a valid notability claim. As always, a band is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because they exist -- real media coverage, supporting a claim which passes NMUSIC, must be present to support one. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when more substance and sourcing can be brought to the table than this. Bearcat (talk) 18:52, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the reasoning of Bearcat. Currently this band only seems notable because a notable person started it; notability is not inherited. 331dot (talk) 19:05, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:42, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's only the expected coverage so far, founded this year of course suggests it's too soon at best and there's nothing yet for solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.