Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SwissDisk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:58, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SwissDisk

SwissDisk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP as it has not received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary independent sources. The company has only received coverage in reliable independent sources as a result of an event in 2009 (see the three refs currently in the article) and the coverage about the company itself is hardly significant ([1] and [2] are passing mentions, and [3] only contains a few sentences with some basic background info on the company). Google Books and Google Scholar searches also only return passing mentions afaics. Felida97 (talk) 16:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, this page was created just to promote the CNet article, which in itself is enough reason to delete it. Note, I am the owner of SwissDisk. Ben Collins (talk) 12:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SwissDisk, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.