Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Switch VFX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Switch VFX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company that has worked on many notable films. Goggle searches in News and Books return only the most minimal of references, mostly list-based. I could not come up with a single independent ref that discusses the company's work. Article created by COI editor-- see talk. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia is not a free public relations or advertising platform for companies to promote or publicize themselves. As with all other fields of human endeavour, a company does not get automatic Wikipedia inclusion rights just because its existence can be verified in directories like IMDb — it earns a Wikipedia article by being the subject of reliable source coverage in media which satisfies WP:CORP. But nothing like that has been shown here, and I'm having about as much luck as the nominator at finding anything more — because it's a Toronto-based company, I ran a ProQuest "Canadian Newsstand" search, and came up completely dry there too. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 13:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as notability is not inherited and simply nothing else suggests the necessary notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.