Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Yaqub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Yaqub (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Historical scholarship does not document, much less discuss, our subject. References are based on local folklore. Jaunpurzada (talk) 15:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh, India and Islam. -- Jaunpurzada (talk) 15:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Local folklore can still be a valid subject assuming the sources are suitable and the information if verifiable. Do the existing sources not check out? The figure is a little hard to search for as it's quite a generic name. There is of course the possibility of alternative spellings, as well as further local language sources. Iskandar323 (talk) 17:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:33, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 19:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment There does seem to be coverage of his reputed shrine in local media. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ficaia: The existing coverage of our subject seems to always be in reference to the location/holder of tomb. As notability is not inherited, it cannot be shown that our subject is notable enough to have its own article on Wikipedia as an individual and not as a tomb resident. Jaunpurzada (talk) 16:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Your opinions on what should happen with this article are welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete with the caveat that there might be foreign language sources I don't have access to, I cannot find anything that demonstrates Yuqub himself is notable; anything I found was as mentioned by Jaun above relating to the tomb itself. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 20:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As per nom lacks indepth references.Lankanrhino (talk) 22:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.