Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syl Tang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close.. Article was nominated twice. An active debate is open at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syl Tang (2nd nomination) (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Syl Tang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising for her new book, which is so far in only 6 libraries. The only possibly RS, the NYT article, is not about her; it's about personal shoppers, and she is included in it as one client. DGG ( talk ) 02:58, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.