Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Symbiotism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Symbiotism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a neologism, probably of the author's own definition. No references and so no indication that the ideology is notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete utterly fails WP:NEO, as in, my searches turn up nothing beyond a use of this word by a movie blogger describing a quite different phenomenon "the symbiotism between both characters" and a lone news outlet discussing "the insidious symbiotism between politics and corruption ..." But that's all. Nothing close to meeting WP:NEO.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:16, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it seems so blatant I think WP:A11 might apply. I'll tag it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:54, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, wait, it could be related to this?. Anyway, the topic as is seems made up, even if he's borrowed elements from elsewhere.
Delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing new to add, really. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NEO. Did my own google search and came up empty. If supporting references do exist, someone should present them, or let this one go. nerdgoonrant (talk) 16:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A completely unsourced WP:NEOLOGISM with a smattering of half-decipherable content. Perhaps at some point there will be supporting and a coherent description of this topic, but not at present. Snow ^{let's rap} 00:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.